[Kong](https://konghq.com) and [Zuplo](https://zuplo.com) both solve the API
gateway problem, but they come from fundamentally different starting points.
Kong is an open-source gateway built on NGINX and Lua, designed for teams that
want full control over their infrastructure. Zuplo is an edge-native, fully
managed platform designed for teams that want API management without the
operational burden.

**For most teams evaluating API gateways in 2026, Zuplo is the better choice.**
It delivers edge-native performance across 300+ global locations, uses
TypeScript instead of Lua, includes a developer portal on every plan, and offers
native AI and MCP capabilities — all without requiring you to manage databases,
clusters, or Kubernetes. Kong remains a strong option for teams that
specifically need a Kubernetes ingress controller or have existing Lua plugin
investments.

If you are comparing these two platforms, the core question is usually: **do you
want to manage your API gateway infrastructure, or do you want someone else to
handle that while you focus on your APIs?**

Here's what sets them apart:

- **Architecture:** Kong runs on NGINX/OpenResty with a PostgreSQL or Cassandra
  database for configuration storage. Zuplo deploys to 300+ global edge
  locations with zero infrastructure to manage.
- **Developer experience:** Kong uses Lua plugins and an Admin API with the decK
  CLI for configuration management. Zuplo uses TypeScript policies with native
  GitOps workflows.
- **Pricing model:** Kong OSS is free but requires significant ops investment.
  Kong Konnect uses consumption-based pricing that can escalate quickly. Zuplo
  offers transparent, usage-based pricing with all infrastructure included.
- **Developer portal:** Kong's developer portal is an enterprise-only feature.
  Zuplo includes an auto-generated developer portal on every plan.
- **Deployment speed:** Kong configuration changes propagate via database
  polling with a 5–10 second window. Zuplo deploys globally in under 20 seconds
  via Git push.

## Feature comparison at a glance

| Feature                | Kong                                 | Zuplo                                             |
| :--------------------- | :----------------------------------- | :------------------------------------------------ |
| **Deployment model**   | Self-hosted or hybrid managed        | 300+ global edge locations                        |
| **Configuration**      | Lua plugins + Admin API / decK CLI   | TypeScript + JSON                                 |
| **Deployment speed**   | 5–10 second propagation window       | Under 20 seconds globally                         |
| **Developer portal**   | Enterprise only                      | Auto-generated from OpenAPI, all plans            |
| **Git integration**    | Requires custom CI/CD + decK         | Native GitOps                                     |
| **Rate limiting**      | OSS + Advanced (enterprise)          | Built-in with sliding window, per-user or per-key |
| **API key management** | Manual via Admin API                 | Built-in self-serve with developer portal         |
| **Pricing**            | OSS free + high ops cost; Konnect $$ | Transparent pricing, infrastructure included      |
| **Custom logic**       | Lua (Go/Python/JS via ext. process)  | Standard TypeScript with npm ecosystem            |

## Architecture

### Kong

Kong is built on [NGINX](https://nginx.org) and
[OpenResty](https://openresty.org), which combines NGINX with the LuaJIT
compiler. This gives Kong high throughput and the ability to extend request
processing through Lua scripts that hook into the NGINX request lifecycle.

A typical Kong deployment involves:

- A **control plane** running the Admin API and Kong Manager UI
- One or more **data plane** nodes running NGINX workers that proxy traffic
- A **PostgreSQL or Cassandra** database storing routes, services, plugins, and
  consumers
- The **decK CLI** for declarative configuration management
- Plugins written in **Lua** (with newer support for Go, Python, and JavaScript
  via external process execution)

Kong offers three deployment models:

1. **Self-hosted (database-backed)** — You manage everything: the database,
   control plane, data plane nodes, clustering, and upgrades.
2. **Kong Konnect** — Kong hosts the control plane, but you still run your own
   data plane nodes on your infrastructure.
3. **Kong Konnect Dedicated Cloud** — Fully managed data planes, but at
   enterprise pricing.

The control plane / data plane separation provides flexibility, but it also
means configuration changes must propagate from the database to each data plane
node. By default, Kong nodes poll for changes every 5–10 seconds, creating a
window where different nodes may serve different configurations.

### Zuplo

Zuplo takes a fundamentally different architectural approach. Instead of running
a centralized proxy, Zuplo deploys your gateway logic to 300+ edge data centers
worldwide using a serverless runtime based on Web Worker technology.

Zuplo offers three deployment models, all providing the same features and APIs:

- **Managed Edge** (default): Your gateway runs across 300+ global points of
  presence. Requests are automatically routed to the nearest location. Zero
  infrastructure to manage. Deployments go live globally in under 20 seconds.
- **Managed Dedicated**: Zuplo runs a dedicated, isolated instance on the cloud
  provider of your choice — AWS, Azure, GCP, Akamai, Equinix, and others. You
  choose the regions. Private networking (AWS PrivateLink, Azure Private Link,
  GCP Private Service Connect) is supported for both inbound and outbound
  connections. Still fully managed by Zuplo.
- **Self-Hosted**: Run Zuplo on your own Kubernetes cluster for complete control
  over your infrastructure. Available in hybrid and full self-hosted models.

There is no database to maintain, no clustering to configure, and no NGINX
tuning to optimize. Rate limiting is enforced globally across all edge locations
as a single zone, so consumers cannot bypass limits by routing through different
regions.

## Developer experience

### Configuration and extensibility

Kong's configuration lives in its database (or YAML files in DB-less mode) and
is managed through the Admin API, Kong Manager UI, or the decK CLI. When you
need custom behavior, you write a Lua plugin that hooks into specific NGINX
request lifecycle phases.

Here is a simple Kong Lua plugin that adds a custom header:

```lua
local MyPlugin = {
  PRIORITY = 1000,
  VERSION = "1.0.0",
}

function MyPlugin:access(conf)
  kong.service.request.set_header(
    "X-Custom-Header",
    conf.header_value
  )
end

return MyPlugin
```

Lua is a capable language, but most development teams do not use it. Finding
engineers with Lua expertise is difficult, and debugging Lua plugins running
inside NGINX worker processes requires specialized knowledge.

Zuplo uses TypeScript for all custom logic. The same header-injection policy in
Zuplo:

```typescript
import { ZuploContext, ZuploRequest } from "@zuplo/runtime";

export default async function (
  request: ZuploRequest,
  context: ZuploContext,
  options: { headerValue: string },
  policyName: string,
) {
  const newRequest = new ZuploRequest(request);
  newRequest.headers.set("X-Custom-Header", options.headerValue);
  return newRequest;
}
```

Zuplo policies use standard Web APIs (`Request`, `Response`, `Headers`, `fetch`)
and have access to the full npm ecosystem. You get type safety, autocomplete,
and inline documentation in any TypeScript-capable editor.

### GitOps and deployment workflows

Achieving GitOps with Kong requires custom work: external scripting, custom
CI/CD pipelines, and the decK CLI to sync declarative config files to the Admin
API. Teams frequently encounter drift between their decK files and the actual
Admin API state, especially in environments that mix declarative and imperative
management.

Zuplo is GitOps-native. All configuration — routes, policies, environment
variables, developer portal settings — lives as files in your Git repository.
Push to a branch to create a preview environment automatically. Merge to main
and the gateway deploys globally. Every deployment is immutable and versioned.
Roll back by reverting a commit.

There is no Admin API to manage, no database state to keep in sync, and no decK
equivalent to install.

## API gateway features

### Rate limiting

Kong provides `rate-limiting` (open source) and `rate-limiting-advanced`
(enterprise only) plugins. The open-source plugin supports local, cluster, and
Redis-backed strategies. The advanced plugin adds sliding window algorithms and
more granular controls but requires an enterprise license.

Zuplo's
[rate limiting policy](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/rate-limit-inbound)
supports per-user, per-IP, or custom function-based limits with sliding window
algorithms out of the box. You can write a custom TypeScript function to define
dynamic rate limit grouping logic — for example, rate limiting by customer tier.
No Redis or separate database is needed.

### Authentication

Both platforms support API key authentication, JWT validation, OAuth token
validation, basic authentication, and mTLS. Key differences:

**Kong** offers a broad set of authentication plugins including `key-auth`,
`jwt`, `basic-auth`, `oauth2`, `hmac-auth`, `ldap-auth`, and `mtls-auth`. The
`oauth2` plugin can act as a full authorization server (issuing tokens, not just
validating). LDAP and HMAC support are built in.

**Zuplo** offers
[API key authentication](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/api-key-inbound) with a
managed key service that includes self-serve key management through the
developer portal. The
[JWT auth policy](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/open-id-jwt-auth-inbound)
works with any OpenID-compliant provider, and Zuplo ships pre-built JWT policies
for Auth0, Cognito, Clerk, Firebase, and Supabase. API key leak detection via
GitHub secret scanning integration, managed WAF with OWASP Core Ruleset,
built-in DDoS protection, and bot detection (enterprise) round out the security
story.

### Request and response transformation

Kong's `request-transformer` and `response-transformer` plugins modify headers,
query parameters, and body content using declarative configuration.

Zuplo provides built-in policies for
[setting request headers](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/set-headers-inbound),
[transforming request bodies](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/transform-body-inbound),
[setting response headers](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/set-headers-outbound),
and
[transforming response bodies](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/transform-body-outbound).
For complex transformations, you write a
[custom TypeScript policy](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/custom-code-inbound)
with full access to the request/response objects and npm packages.

### OpenAPI support

Kong does not use OpenAPI as its native configuration format. Routes are defined
through the Admin API or in Kong's own YAML schema. You can import an OpenAPI
spec using third-party tools, but it is not the primary workflow.

Zuplo is [OpenAPI-native](https://zuplo.com/docs/articles/open-api). Routes are
defined in a `routes.oas.json` file that is a valid OpenAPI 3.1 document
extended with `x-zuplo-route` for gateway behavior. You can import an existing
OpenAPI spec directly and add gateway configuration on top of it. The developer
portal, request validation, and API documentation all derive from this single
source of truth.

## Developer portal

Kong's developer portal is available only with Kong Enterprise or Kong Konnect
paid plans. It requires setup, manual documentation writing, and ongoing
maintenance. The community edition of Kong does not include a developer portal.

Zuplo's [developer portal](https://zuplo.com/docs/dev-portal/introduction) is
included on every plan, including free. It is auto-generated from your OpenAPI
spec and updates automatically every time you deploy. Features include
interactive API documentation, a built-in API explorer for testing endpoints,
self-serve API key management, and authentication with any OIDC provider. The
portal is built on [Zudoku](https://zudoku.dev), an open-source framework, and
can be customized with CSS, Markdown, and React components.

## Performance and latency

Kong's performance is strong — NGINX and LuaJIT deliver high throughput for
single-node deployments. However, Kong operates as a centralized proxy. Traffic
routes through the region where your Kong nodes are deployed, which means
latency increases for users far from that region. Multi-region deployments
require manually provisioning and syncing clusters in each region.

Zuplo's edge-native architecture means requests are processed at the data center
closest to the user. With 300+ global locations, most requests are served within
50ms of the end user. The edge runtime uses V8 isolates that provide near-zero
cold starts (milliseconds, not seconds), and deployments propagate globally in
under 20 seconds. Multi-region is the default behavior, not an add-on.

## Pricing and total cost of ownership

### Kong

Kong Gateway OSS is free to download, but the total cost of ownership includes:

- **Infrastructure**: PostgreSQL or Cassandra database, compute for control
  plane and data plane nodes, load balancers, monitoring
- **Staffing**: Engineers skilled in NGINX, Lua, and database administration.
  Kong-specialized DevOps engineers command premium salaries.
- **Kong Konnect Plus**: Consumption-based pricing with ~$34 per million
  requests, ~$105/month per gateway service, and ~$720/month for dedicated cloud
  instances. Overage charges can add up quickly at high volumes.
- **Kong Enterprise**: Custom pricing with annual contracts, typically exceeding
  $50,000/year for mid-sized deployments

### Zuplo

Zuplo's [pricing](https://zuplo.com/pricing) is transparent:

- **Free plan**: 100K requests/month, unlimited API keys and environments,
  developer portal included
- **Builder plan**: $25/month, 100K requests included, scales to 1M
  requests/month
- **Enterprise plan**: Custom pricing starting at $1,000/month on annual
  contracts, with SLAs up to 99.999%

All plans include deployment to 300+ edge locations, unlimited environments, API
key management, and the developer portal. There are no per-environment charges,
no database to maintain, and no infrastructure to staff.

For many teams, the total cost of running Kong — even the open-source version —
exceeds what they would pay for Zuplo's fully managed platform.

## API monetization

Kong offers monetization capabilities through enterprise-tier plugins and
third-party integrations, but native monetization is not a core focus of the
platform.

Zuplo has built-in
[API monetization](https://zuplo.com/docs/articles/monetization/stripe-integration)
with native metering, real-time quota enforcement, and Stripe billing
integration. You define meters (request counts, tokens, bytes, or custom
dimensions), create plans with rate cards (flat fee, per-unit, tiered, volume,
or package pricing), and publish them to your developer portal. Customers
subscribe through Stripe Checkout, get plan-scoped API keys, and usage is
metered and enforced at the gateway in real time.

## AI capabilities

Zuplo has invested heavily in AI gateway features:

- Auto-generated [MCP server](https://zuplo.com/docs/mcp-server/introduction)
  from OpenAPI specs, making your APIs discoverable by AI agents
- Centralized [MCP Gateway](https://zuplo.com/mcp-gateway) for managing all MCP
  servers
- [AI Gateway](https://zuplo.com/ai-gateway) with model routing to OpenAI,
  Anthropic, Google, and other LLM providers
- Real-time token usage and cost tracking

Kong has introduced AI-specific plugins including AI Proxy and AI Prompt
Decorator (open source) and AI Rate Limiting Advanced and AI Proxy Advanced
(enterprise only), but the MCP ecosystem and AI-native gateway features are less
developed.

## Plugin ecosystem

Kong's plugin ecosystem is one of its strongest features. With 100+ plugins
available (a mix of open source, enterprise, and community-contributed), Kong
covers a wide range of use cases out of the box. However, writing custom plugins
requires Lua expertise, and community plugins vary in quality and maintenance.

Zuplo takes a different approach. Instead of a traditional plugin marketplace,
Zuplo provides a catalog of built-in policies (authentication, rate limiting,
transformation, validation, and more) combined with the ability to write
[custom TypeScript policies](https://zuplo.com/docs/policies/custom-code-inbound)
for anything not covered. Because policies are standard TypeScript, any
developer on your team can write and maintain them — no specialized language
knowledge required.

## When to choose Kong

Kong may be the better choice if:

- You need a **Kubernetes ingress controller** tightly integrated with your
  cluster's networking
- Your team has existing expertise in **NGINX, Lua, and Kong's ecosystem** and
  wants to continue leveraging that investment
- You require **on-premises deployment** in environments with no internet
  connectivity (air-gapped)
- You need Kong to act as a **full OAuth 2.0 authorization server** (issuing
  tokens, not just validating)
- You rely on a specific **Kong community or enterprise plugin** that has no
  equivalent elsewhere

## When to choose Zuplo

Zuplo is the better choice if:

- You want **edge-native performance** without managing infrastructure — your
  gateway is distributed globally by default
- Your team prefers **TypeScript over Lua** and wants access to the npm
  ecosystem for custom logic
- You value **GitOps workflows** with instant preview environments on every pull
  request
- You need a **developer portal** included out of the box, not locked behind an
  enterprise license
- You want **transparent pricing** without consumption-based surprises or
  enterprise-minimum contracts
- You need **API monetization** with native metering and Stripe billing
  integration
- You are building AI-powered applications and want native **MCP server and AI
  gateway** capabilities
- You run **multi-cloud backends** and need a single gateway that fronts AWS,
  Azure, GCP, and on-premises services from one configuration

## Migration path

If you are currently running Kong and considering a move to Zuplo, the
[Kong to Zuplo migration guide](https://zuplo.com/learning-center/migrate-from-kong-to-zuplo)
covers plugin-to-policy mapping, configuration translation, and a phased
migration plan. Most teams complete the migration in two to four weeks.

For a structured feature comparison, see the
[Kong vs Zuplo comparison page](https://zuplo.com/api-gateways/kong-alternative-zuplo).

## Get started with Zuplo

[Sign up for free](https://portal.zuplo.com) and set up your first gateway in
minutes with the
[getting started guide](https://zuplo.com/docs/articles/step-1-setup-basic-gateway).

## Related guides

- [Best API Management Platforms (2026)](/learning-center/best-api-management-platforms-2026)
  — Compare Zuplo, Kong, Apigee, AWS, Azure, Tyk, and Cloudflare across
  developer experience, performance, and AI capabilities.
- [Best API Management Tools in 2026](/learning-center/best-api-management-tools-2026)
  — A developer's guide to choosing the right API management tool for your team.
- [What Is an API Gateway?](/learning-center/what-is-an-api-gateway) — The
  complete guide to API gateways, architecture patterns, and how to choose the
  right one.
- [Choosing an API Gateway: Zuplo vs Kong vs Traefik vs Tyk](/learning-center/choosing-an-api-gateway)
  — A head-to-head comparison of four popular API gateways across architecture,
  performance, and developer experience.